The event and the interpretation

Men are disturbed not by things, but by the views which they take of things.

Epictetus

Enchiridion · §5

Translated by Thomas Wentworth Higginson. Higginson translation; linked 1955 revised edition (public domain in the United States). Teaching of Epictetus compiled by Arrian; Higginson translation.

Read the source ↗

An unanswered message is an event. Deciding that it proves disrespect is an interpretation. Epictetus asks us to notice the space between the two. His claim is deliberately strong; illness, loss, and injustice have real effects that cannot be erased by changing a thought. But our account of an event can add a second layer of distress, especially when we treat an uncertain explanation as a settled fact. The useful practice is to separate what happened, what we know, and what we are assuming. Another explanation may be possible even when the situation still requires a firm response.

A question for today

What fact have you added an untested story to?

Previous
Previous

Refusing to resemble the injury

Next
Next

A pause before the reply